这本书揭秘:

选举教宗弗朗西斯是秘密会议的成果.

这些会议是由Carlo Maria Martini在瑞士St. Gall举办多年的激进自由派红衣主教和主教。这就是JürgenMettepenningen和Karim Shelkens声称的内容，他是刚刚出版的比利时红衣主教Godfried Danneels传记的作者。

这本书揭示了红衣主教是反对教宗本笃十六世的教会密友组的正式成员。

丹尼尔斯说，正式但谨慎地标记为“圣加仑集团”的成员被其成员称为“黑手党”。其自我实现的目标是实现对教会的彻底改革，使其“更加现代化”，并让红衣主教Jorge Bergoglio领导它。

该小组自1996年以来每年都会面，他们一起组织了对红衣主教拉辛格的秘密“抵抗”，后者当时是若望保禄二世的得力助手。他们当时的目标是选择一名“改革者”教宗，最终取代若望保禄二世，因为他即将死亡，并且不惜一切代价阻止选举红衣主教拉辛格为教宗。该小组越来越强调的问题是：“若望保禄二世之后是什么？我们怎样才能避免拉辛格成为教宗？'“

当教宗若望保禄二世在2005年去世时，该团体已经将现任教宗推向了前列，尽管最终，红衣主教拉辛格尽管付出了努力仍然当选。

八年后，在2013年，他们终于得到了他们想要的东西，教宗弗朗西斯根据他们最初的愿景重新塑造了教会。

该组织成员中包括最激进自由的教会主教和红衣主教，如红衣主教Walter Kasper，德国红衣主教Karl Lehmann，意大利红衣主教Achille Silvestrini，荷兰红衣主教Adriann Van Luyn，英国红衣主教Basil Hume以及已故耶稣会红衣主教Carlo Maria Martini。

Schelkens 本周接受采访时表示：“红衣主教贝尔格里奥的选举毫无疑问是在圣加仑准备的。教宗正在执行的计划的主要内容是Danneels和Co十多年前开始讨论的那些。““为我祷告，我可能不会因为害怕狼而逃跑。” 

教宗本笃十六世（在教宗就职典礼期间演讲）

同性恋“婚姻”的倡导者

红衣主教丹尼尔斯被公认为教会最自由的高级教士之一。

他曾建议比利时国王在1990年签署堕胎法。他拒绝禁止在比利时天主教学校使用色情“教育”材料。

他曾经说  同性恋“婚姻”  是一种“积极的发展”。红衣主教还致信比利时总理Guy Verhofstadt，称赞他“批准了同性伴侣之间稳定关系的法律法规。”Verhofstadt政府于2003年向比利时引入同性恋“婚姻”。

梵蒂冈将教宗弗朗西斯亲自选出的45名代表参加即将举行的会议，其中Danneels的重要性位列第二。

译文来源:

The election Pope Francis was the fruit of secret meetings that radically liberal cardinals and bishops, organized by Carlo Maria Martini, held for years at St. Gall in Switzerland.  This is what is claimed by Jürgen Mettepenningen and Karim  Shelkens, the authors of a just published biography of the Belgian Cardinal Godfried Danneels.

The book reveals that the Cardinal was a regular member of a secret pressure group of Churchmen that opposed Pope Benedict XVI. Danneels said that what was officially but discreetly labeled “the Sankt-Gallen group” was referred to by its members as “the Mafia”. Its self-imposed aim was to achieve a drastic reform of the Church, to make it “much more modern”, and for Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio to head it.

The group met every year since 1996, and together they organized the secret “resistance” against Cardinal Ratzinger, who at that time was the right-hand man of John Paul II.  Their goal at the time was to elect a “reformer” pope to eventually replace John Paul II, in view of his nearing death, and to prevent at all costs the election of Cardinal Ratzinger as Pope. The question that was put more and more emphatically by the group was: “What after John Paul II? How can we avoid Ratzinger as Pope?’”

When Pope John Paul II died in 2005, the group already pushed the present Pope to the fore, although in the end, Cardinal Ratzinger still got elected despite their efforts. Eight years later, in 2013, they finally got what they wanted, with Pope Francis re-shaping the Church according to their original vision.

The group counts amongst its members the most radically liberal bishops and cardinals of the Church, such as Cardinal Walter Kasper, Cardinal Karl Lehmann from Germany, Cardinal Achille Silvestrini from Italy, Dutch Cardinal Adriann Van Luyn, Cardinal Basil Hume from England, and the late Jesuit Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini.

Said Schelkens in an interview this week: “The election of Cardinal Bergoglio was prepared in Sankt-Gallen, without doubt. And the main lines of the program the Pope is carrying out are those that Danneels and Co were starting to discuss more than ten years ago.”

In Violation of Papal Law

Saint John Paul II’s Apostolic Constitution Universi Domini Gregis clearly forbids under pain of automatic excommunication (i.e. immediately imposed, without necessity of declaration) the canvassing for votes:

Let the Cardinal electors, moreover, abstain from all pacts, agreements, promises and any other obligations you like, by which they might be constrained to give or refuse support for anyone.

The constitution of a “Mafia” like the Sankt-Gallen group is in clear violation of that papal order.  In another section Universi Domini Gregis, St. John Paul II expounded further on this:

Confirming the prescriptions of my Predecessors, I likewise forbid anyone, even if he is a Cardinal, during the Pope’s lifetime and without having consulted him, to make plans concerning the election of his successor, or to promise votes, or to make decisions in this regard in private gatherings.

It must be noted that St. John Paul II published the above papal law in February 1996, the very year that the Sankt-Gallen group was formed.

The above revelations reinforce the shocking claims of Dr. Austen Ivereigh (author of the book The Great Reformer: Francis and the Making of a Radical Pope) who said that a group of Cardinals actively “campaigned” for the election of Pope Francis, in violation of the papal law.

Advocate of Same-Sex “Marriage”

Cardinal Danneels is recognized as one of the most radically liberal prelates of the Church.

He once advised the king of Belgium to sign an abortion law in 1990. He has refused to forbid pornographic, “educational” materials being used in Belgian Catholic schools.

He once said same-sex “marriage” was a “positive development”.  The cardinal also wrote a letter to Belgian Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt praising him for “the approval of a legal statute for a stable relationship between partners of the same sex.” Verhofstadt’s government introduced same sex-‘marriage’ into Belgium in 2003.

The Vatican listed Danneels second in importance out of 45 delegates personally chosen by Pope Francis to participate in the upcoming meeting.